News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Taboos and Self-Censorship Among U.S. Psychology Professors by svnt on Thursday June 13, 2024 @07:47AM (#40668445)
The point is to highlight topics that people would be inclined not to research, or not to publish if their conclusions did not support their perception of the majority view.

It would have been more interesting if in addition to capturing the professor’s position they captured the professor’s perception of the majority position, to see if the professor believed they were part of a silent majority or in the minority, but if they did I skimmed past that part.

Re:Taboos and Self-Censorship Among U.S. Psychology Professors by ithkuil on Thursday June 13, 2024 @03:56PM (#40673941)
Yes. But unfortunately the conclusion that many people take home is that if something has been censured it must be true.

It's not how logic works, but it's how human psychology seems to work. Or perhaps that's taboo too? I don't know. IANAP