Re:Apple Explains Why iOS Don't Need No Steenkin' Anti-Virus
by bradleyland on Monday June 04, 2012 @02:36PM
(#4065221)
And yet, A/V hasn't been -- by any reasonable measure -- succesful in stopping malicious software. Maybe the solution is to stop installing software from untrustworthy sources?
My statement can't be taken without context. Stated with more context: "there is no inherent aspect of an operating system that favors A/V as protection from malicious software over any other (like code signing)." In practice, quite the opposite is true. We've proven, through practice, that A/V is a poor solution.
Re:Apple Explains Why iOS Don't Need No Steenkin' Anti-Virus
by gurkendoktor on Monday June 04, 2012 @12:18PM
(#4064638)
> If the user installs software from untrustworthy sources
This has never been an inherent possibility on mobile operating systems.
Re:Apple Explains Why iOS Don't Need No Steenkin' Anti-Virus
by cantankerous on Monday June 04, 2012 @03:05PM
(#4065344)
Well, you can do it on Android, but they make it hard enough that you really have to know that you want to. There have been isolated instances of this being a source of malicious problem for users, though.
Most operating systems allow you to install software. If the user installs software from untrustworthy sources an A/V is the only thing that can protect him/her. No it isn't perfect but few claim it to be.