News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DuckDB Isn't Just Fast by sethammons on Tuesday June 11, 2024 @07:03AM (#40644803)
> 7100 rows

For analytic queries, I don't feel that is anywhere near what I've seen at multiple companies who gave opted for columnar storage. That would be at most a few seconds of incoming data.

With so few rows, I would not be surprised if you could use standard command line tools to get the same results from a text file of similar size in an acceptable time.

Re:DuckDB Isn't Just Fast by belter on Tuesday June 11, 2024 @07:07AM (#40644831)
Certainly not. We typically would talk about hundreds of millions to billions of rows.

Just trying to reproduce the use case...Also tried with the Parquet file from the support ticket. Around 90,000 rows...