News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Brain overgrowth dictates autism severity, new research s... by asne11 on Friday June 07, 2024 @06:12AM (#40607104)
Why can't this be a simple observation?
Re:Brain overgrowth dictates autism severity, new research s... by HelloMcFly on Friday June 07, 2024 @11:40AM (#40609715)
Absent any supporting data it's just a weird personal observation and comes off a bit creepy. I'm not saying the author is a creep, it's just a very peculiar way to make a point that could be made much less oddly. Do 1st graders need to have assess commented on and compared to 16 year olds (another group whose asses most of us do not observe with intention)? Why not just make a comment about weight generally?
Re:Brain overgrowth dictates autism severity, new research s... by sandworm101 on Friday June 07, 2024 @03:39PM (#40612154)
Because body development is a science. Alterations to development patterns are sometimes linked to exposure to chemicals and such. For instance, back in the 90s some male kids grew breast tissues after exposure to then-common synthetic fragrances. It may be creepy, but someone has to notice these things as the proverbial canary in the coalmine.
Re:Brain overgrowth dictates autism severity, new research s... by HelloMcFly on Saturday June 08, 2024 @09:59AM (#40617597)
> It may be creepy, but someone has to notice these things as the proverbial canary in the coalmine.

I do not disagree, but there is a way to notice it and comment on it that has far less probability of being considered "creepy" by someone reading. The author is of course free to do as they please, doesn't make their point any more right or wrong.