News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:lsix: Like "ls", but for images by kaba0 on Friday June 07, 2024 @01:27AM (#40605589)
But.. why? Why would I want to force pixel graphics into a text-based, low-resolution matrix, when.. I could just do pixel graphics?
Re:lsix: Like "ls", but for images by vmfunction on Friday June 07, 2024 @02:53AM (#40605980)
There are many terminal users, check their email in terminal, and use browser like Links, Links2, and would like to be able to see pictures sometimes.

Also graphics response in terminal are blazing fast, and compared to whatever is happening in the Apple, MS and Gnome GUI environment that are just getting sluggish by the version upgrade. More and more I just want to do everything in terminal, and not have to deal with all this GPU acceleration BS that is happening. Give me the UI in pixels likes it is 1980's. Most of times just want to do my work, We don't care if there is some anti-aliasing or shadows under the text.

Re:lsix: Like "ls", but for images by kaba0 on Friday June 07, 2024 @04:21AM (#40606494)
> Also graphics response in terminal are blazing fast, and compared to whatever is happening in the Apple, MS and Gnome GUI environment that are just getting sluggish by the version upgrade

Gnome is far from slow, and doing it properly matters. Sure, you can also have mouse and whatnot integration in a terminal.. but it becomes questionable.

Re:lsix: Like "ls", but for images by jph00 on Friday June 07, 2024 @12:12PM (#40610014)
Console-based analysis over SSH is much easier when your console tools can just output charts etc directly to the terminal. Also image processing scripts are easier to write when you can directly view the images created at each stage of the process.