Re:The Right Not to Be Subjected to AI Profiling Based on Pu...
by JumpCrisscross on Thursday June 06, 2024 @08:27PM
(#40604042)
> emissions and efficiency difference between 55, 60, 65, and 70mph are significant and cannot be understated
Wouldn't this be an argument for a higher EV speed limit?
Re:The Right Not to Be Subjected to AI Profiling Based on Pu...
by amanaplanacanal on Friday June 07, 2024 @04:36AM
(#40606593)
You typically don’t want different limits for different vehicles on the same highway. Although where I live trucks have a lower limit than passenger vehicles.
Re:The Right Not to Be Subjected to AI Profiling Based on Pu...
by xerox13ster on Monday June 17, 2024 @10:39AM
(#40706066)
Not unless you reallllllllly enjoy inhaling extremely carcinogenic brake dust and tire microplastics and rubber dust.
The efficiency loss at speed still applies to EVs due to friction and laws of momentum.
In fact, the reason most national highways have a speedlimit of 50mph, even out in the boonies in Kansas where everything is flat and straight, is because of the fuel crisis of the 70s.
When I was a child, I was curious why highways were 50mph but the interstates had a speedlimit of 65-70mph, so I went and found out instead of assuming it was a disingenous revenue grab.
Most interstates were generally built after the fuel crisis, and they modified the national speed limit in 1988, setting the speed to 65mph, again for efficiency reasons. It was repealed in 1995. Perhaps 65mph is what was considered safe for the road and vehicular technology at the time, and no one has had the political or municipal capital to do a new study ever since.
You want that speed limit changed, contact your reps, I guess.