Re:A tiny interpreter for a stack-based language
by brianobush on Sunday December 21, 2008 @07:42PM
(#405915)
his anonymous blocks ( 1 + ) look straight from false, http://wouter.fov120.com/false/ with different syntax, but the same idea: 2 [ 1 + ] ! leaves 3 as top of stack.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A tiny interpreter for a stack-based language
by silentbicycle on Monday December 22, 2008 @07:47AM
(#406324)
Joy, as well. (http://www.latrobe.edu.au/philosophy/phimvt/joy.html)
Putting words in a list is also a way to do quoting, so you get the lispy code-is-data property without necessarily needing Forth-style immediate words.