News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:You'll regret using natural keys by fhars on Wednesday June 05, 2024 @08:12AM (#40583920)
That is "AT", isn't it?

(No, it isn't, if you look closely enough.)

Re:You'll regret using natural keys by smaudet on Wednesday June 05, 2024 @09:49AM (#40584729)
Yeah...what I'd really like to do would be to give a character a "natural" background color, e.g.

Then its simple for support to say "red is one, green is ell". But you can't just add a color to a character, because copy paste/rich formatting don't work everywhere, or even transfer well...

Alternatively, if you use ⓪ and ⒈ it matters less if the user says "at" or "zero", and more that they didn't say "oh" or "one".

Re:You'll regret using natural keys by Piskvorrr on Wednesday June 05, 2024 @01:03PM (#40587474)
It's obviously a �. Or perhaps a □ . Maybe an ¾, on odd Wednesdays?

(Unicode has its strengths. Making up replacement characters isn't one.)

Re:You'll regret using natural keys by codr7 on Wednesday June 05, 2024 @02:14PM (#40588366)
I happen to know that the biggest ski resort reservation system in Scandinavia contains a function called MaybeOnATuesday(), but to my knowledge it's never called.