News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Go east from Seattle by enoch_r on Monday June 03, 2024 @06:50PM (#40568567)
> Travel exactly due East. Now, ignore what East means.

It's "face east, then travel in a straight line," not "travel due East" (though I agree that the title itself is misleading).

IMO, it's a cool thought experiment because it demonstrates that an instruction to "travel in a straight line" is incompatible with an instruction to "travel due East" (unless you're on the equator!) - as the North Pole example illustrates. Start 3 feet south of the North Pole and face east, then start traveling in a straight line. Obviously after 10 or 100 or 1000 miles of travel you'll be essentially due south of the pole - and in fact, if you take a single step to the left, you will be exactly due south of the pole!

Re:Go east from Seattle by cush on Monday June 03, 2024 @08:11PM (#40569253)
Everyone's replying as if the title and image don't exist
Re:Go east from Seattle by RaftPeople on Monday June 03, 2024 @09:14PM (#40569673)
> It's "face east, then travel in a straight line," not "travel due East" (though I agree that the title itself is misleading).

It's a fun and interesting problem, but just to be the contrarian:

The solution didn't travel in a straight line any more than the alternate (incorrect solution), both resulted in arcs.

Re:Go east from Seattle by yencabulator on Monday June 03, 2024 @10:55PM (#40570258)
Any straight line that's tangential to the surface of a sphere will lead off the sphere.