News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Alaska Supreme Court takes aerial surveillance's thre... by hiatus on Monday June 03, 2024 @02:26PM (#40565719)
> If a person, unaided by technology, can from a public property, see something in or on the property, while passing by at a walking pace, no warrant is needed.

Is the person allowed to wear glasses? If so, what do you view the limit to be for allowed technology? Binoculars and telescopes use similar technology.

Re:The Alaska Supreme Court takes aerial surveillance's thre... by brain-tree on Monday June 03, 2024 @03:29PM (#40566559)
I feel like the state has wasted more than enough energy defining the difference between a prescription to treat a demonstrable physical deficit and snorting crystal meth.