News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Re-Evaluating GPT-4's Bar Exam Performance by violet13 on Sunday June 02, 2024 @05:09PM (#40557217)
It is a lossy compressed index. It has an approximate knowledge of law, and that approximation can be pretty good - but it doesn't know when it's outputting plausible but made-up claims. As with GitHub Copilot, it's probably going to be a mixed bag until we can overcome that, because spotting subtle but grave errors can be harder than writing something from scratch.

There's already a fair number of stories of LLMs used by an attorney messing up court filings - e.g., inventing fake case law.

Re:Re-Evaluating GPT-4's Bar Exam Performance by jeffbee on Sunday June 02, 2024 @05:17PM (#40557259)
I am not suggesting that the generative aspects would be useful in drafting motions and such. I am suggesting that their tendency towards false results is harmless if you just use them as a complex index. For example, you could ask it to list appellate cases where one party argued such-and-such and prevailed. Then you would go read the cases.