Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build...
by osigurdson on Saturday June 01, 2024 @10:54PM
(#40550967)
Fully agree! Instead of bringing the middle class down, instead lift everyone up. The alternative is pure and irrational evil.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build...
by tsimionescu on Sunday June 02, 2024 @01:18AM
(#40551567)
The alternative to good public transit for everyone is bad public transit for the majority and cars for a few.
You don't get to imagine an alternative like "cars for everyone", because it's simply not possible.
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build...
by osigurdson on Sunday June 02, 2024 @08:17AM
(#40553507)
That is literally what we have now.
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build...
by beart on Sunday June 02, 2024 @11:09AM
(#40554795)
I don't recall receiving my tax-funded F-150 from the government this year.
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build...
by tsimionescu on Sunday June 02, 2024 @12:53PM
(#40555517)
No, in most cities most people by far use public transit for their commute. And in most cities, especially where this is not exactly true, car traffic is already hellish at rush hour.
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build...
by osigurdson on Sunday June 02, 2024 @03:41PM
(#40556717)
I wonder what most of the commuters do at work? Sit in front of a computer maybe?
Re:In Colorado, an Ambitious New Highway Policy Is Not Build...
by tsimionescu on Monday June 03, 2024 @02:52AM
(#40560015)
What does that have to do with anything?
I do agree that work-from-home should be a part of the transit solution. But not even the entire software industry can work from home, nevermind all the other industries that sometimes use computers.