But then you go play a game on windows, and everything works instantly. When performance is critical to have a good experience, it can be done, and pretty well.
Most desktop software just doesn't give a shit about performance.
Re:X is justifiably slow
by renegade-otter on Sunday June 02, 2024 @09:49PM
(#40558666)
Games have always been one sector where squeezing out every ounce of performance is the goal. And, unlike web devs, game developers test their products on inferior hardware, not just the latest and greatest video cards.
I’m fairly sure you would be equally upset with your world document taking multiple seconds to load were it lower bandwidth. Or if you couldn’t have a 4k screen at 120Hz, which is severalfold more data than hd@60Hz
There isn't a singular cause to brainstorm. It's everything in the entire stack optimizing just a bit in other directions that produces the end result of disappointing, sluggish computers despite their actual capabilities. This discussion isn't going to tread any new ground either. All of these things are known because there are people who can't afford modern computing, like the HFT firms that are all on FPGAs now and real-time embedded systems. It's not hard to do, it's just tedious and expensive the way development used to be for everyone.