Secondly, the Cold War is a misnomer, the US was very much involved in an open confrontation with the Chinese+Soviets in Korea, and to a lesser extent with their proxies in Vietnam later on.
Yes, the Korean war was fought under the aegis of a resolution issued by the UN security council, but it was a 'hot' war, and part of a broad push against Communist influence.
Secondly, the Cold War has two possible referents among political scientists (see the link I posted), and the one in question is not the Soviet one.
Now, these are basic facts that you are clearly wrong about. But I will get downvoted anyway. There is something very wrong with you people.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_war_(general_term)
You're wrong, but at least you're not a coward.
Stuxnet is a weapon of sabotage, it is fairly direct, and yet it is not the same as an open declaration of war.
Did you miss out on Sesame Street? "One of these things are not like the other..."
No I'm not trolling. I am expected to be treated like a troll by the herd here however.
Wikipedia does not back your definition, as the Wiki entry leaves room for espionage, sabotage, and other actions that one might consider an "attack" but certainly do not force a declaration of war, mobilization of armies, etc.