Re:Tiny number of 'supersharers' spread the majority of fake...
by cies on Saturday June 01, 2024 @06:49AM
(#40544559)
CDC has lied to us about safe and effective. CIA has lied to us (and congress) so much we all lost count. Whitehouse lied about Burisma kick backs. All have a lot of links with MSM. Are these "supershares" considered fake news spreaders? Or are we only attacking independent citizen journalism's mistakes, which will surely lead to more curbing of freedom of speech, while looking the other way when tax paid orgs --that are within the control span of the govt-- spread mis information?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tiny number of 'supersharers' spread the majority of fake...
by kmudrick on Saturday June 01, 2024 @07:21AM
(#40544748)
> Whitehouse lied about Burisma kick backs
You fell for Grassley's and Comer's lies. Not cool to spread misinformation on HN either: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-burisma-fd1023/
Re:Tiny number of 'supersharers' spread the majority of fake...
by brainphreeze on Saturday June 01, 2024 @08:09AM
(#40545058)
Snopes is part of the problem, not a solution at all