Re:25 Years of Krita
by Vt71fcAqt7 on Friday May 31, 2024 @08:42AM
(#40534407)
Why do you think Photoshop is low quality? In my mind Photoshop is very high quality. It just costs money and isn't open source.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
In their example Photoshop was "brand name", while Gimp was "low quality" and Krita was "high quality".
Re:25 Years of Krita
by Vt71fcAqt7 on Friday May 31, 2024 @09:09AM
(#40534697)
I see that now. For some reason I read the first arrow as the arrow of implication.
Re:25 Years of Krita
by HelloNurse on Friday May 31, 2024 @10:05AM
(#40535359)
Photoshop is also low quality, in its own special ways, but it's a different topic.
Re:25 Years of Krita
by onionisafruit on Friday May 31, 2024 @10:33AM
(#40535718)
They were saying the Photoshop is the brand name and gimp is itβs low quality replacement.