Re:Microsoft Rolling Out New Windows Subsystem for Linux "WS...
by hulitu on Friday May 31, 2024 @01:40AM
(#40531850)
> - The windows GUI is far superior to anything Linux has to offer - PowerToys/Fancy Zones offers snapping and window control I could never replicate on Linux - despite multiple years of trying to.
Fvwm ? I won't comment about Windows.
All three have something to offer - the "Why" of Windows+WSL.
- WSL offers a pretty pure modern Linux experience - which takes an awful lot of brew effort to replicate on a Mac.
- The windows GUI is far superior to anything Linux has to offer - PowerToys/Fancy Zones offers snapping and window control I could never replicate on Linux - despite multiple years of trying to.
- I spend 80% of my time in tmux/terminal.
- Bare Bones Windows Terminal is absolutely rock solid and high performance.
- Linux native is more stable than Windows+WSL - I would go months without rebooting my Linux system. My windows system rarely makes it more than a couple weeks.
- I use my laptop as a workstation (Precision 5560 - it only get ~80 minutes battery, even with all the discrete NVIDIA stuff turned off) - so the (significant) superiority of Mac Laptop Portability doesn't do anything for me.
If Microsoft can dial in the stability of WSL -speaking as one who has spent at least 1/2 decade on all three platforms at work - My preference for work is Windows + WSL for GUI + Linux experience reasons. If I didn't think Microsoft was going to fix WSL, I'd probably switch to Arch.
For personal use - I have a NUC11 with a Decent RTX2060 video card for Steam Gaming, and would never consider anything for a personal laptop than a macbook in one form or another.