News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why, after 6 years, I'm over GraphQL by sodapopcan on Thursday May 30, 2024 @03:33PM (#40527736)
This was my experience. We were forced to use it in a project where we controlled the entire stack. It was so much extract work just to serve data from a backend we had full control over. I don't dislike it but I feel like it's far more of a time-and-place technology than most that people just default to using in any old situation. I'm sure some have used it successfully in a similar scenario—we certainly weren't exactly super knowledgable about it when we were told to use it. We tried, though!
Re:Why, after 6 years, I'm over GraphQL by torginus on Friday May 31, 2024 @06:03PM (#40540796)
Why does Facebook keep pumping out 21st century moral equivalents of UML and OOP design patterns - trendy technological ideas that are often considered the gateway to writing 'professional' code, but end up being overengineered boilerplate nobody actually needs.

GraphQL is one, Redux is another.

Re:Why, after 6 years, I'm over GraphQL by LudwigNagasena on Saturday June 01, 2024 @08:42AM (#40545266)
Few companies operate on a scale of Facebook.
Re:Why, after 6 years, I'm over GraphQL by burutthrow1234 on Saturday June 01, 2024 @09:28AM (#40545577)
GraphQL makes sense in the narrow context of "you have a high latency end-user and you're pulling in deeply nested social graph data". It didn't need to be a general purpose framework, but you don't get to start your own company and talk at conventions about the clever API design you did at Facebook for Facebook-only problems. The incentives are for (a certain type of) developers to act like this solution is a panacea and sell it as a revolutionary new architecture.