[dead]
Re:You can force employees back to the office, but not the g...
by throwaway8481 on Wednesday May 29, 2024 @04:26AM
(#40509719)
I've struggled with ending my shift and mentally checking out of work. However, I wouldn't impose going back to the office on others who can do this effectively. I think the comment is about maintaining a work-from-some-office-space capability.
Re:You can force employees back to the office, but not the g...
by kkfx on Wednesday May 29, 2024 @05:13AM
(#40509983)
Well, as the others have to realize the same. RTO meaning IMPOSING all return to the office, so imposing the will of some on all. WFH does not means imposing the end of the office if so many want it and they want something doable.
I have my wills, of course, some are doable, some are not. I really want to be immortal, never fell ill, find a large plethora of sex-hungry partners and so on, these are just few examples of not really doable personal will. If the office can economically survive because it does work it will, if the slice of those who want WFH is big enough to kill the office that's how democracy works. I do like WFH, I do not pretend imposing others the same, as long as others do not pretend imposing me the office.
Of course I observe issues and strong points in both models, so the future will be decided by the majority anyway. We will see, knowing that any imposition tend to last less and less as more and more it's imposing and impacting people life.