3% may represent local shortages as Santa Monica is more desired than West Adams etc. So increasing availability in undesirable places may not reduce rents in general.
In aggregate, 5-7% seems to be a sweet spot where landlords can find tenants in a reasonable amount of time and tenants are not scrambling to send out a dozen applications a week.
Though I agree less desirable locations should definitely increase the average, as should purchases vs rentals etc. It’s just 3% is already including a lot of mandatory time from cleaning, painting walls, replacing carpets, etc. So prices could fall heavily at a sustained 4% long before you hit the 5-7% range.
The other metric is median rent as a percentage of median income. Nationally it has hit 40% when the affordability mark is 33%.
Just because what you are experiencing has been a norm for a while does not make it good, or the goal.
It’s similar to how totally full employment is actually a sign of a labor shortage.