Re:Truth, Math, and Models (Part 8 in a series on the scient...
by lisper on Monday May 27, 2024 @09:01PM
(#40496355)
I don't disagree, but FWIW, I've spent quite a bit of time studying theology, and Christian apologetics and YEC in particular. I actually ran a Bible study in conjunction with a local church for about four years. So I may have a little bit more leverage than you think.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Truth, Math, and Models (Part 8 in a series on the scient...
by quanto on Monday May 27, 2024 @09:21PM
(#40496462)
Could you share what your leverage is in this case and how such leverage is reflected in the material? The preceding comment was a critique on your written material, not your personal leverage in the community.
Re:Truth, Math, and Models (Part 8 in a series on the scient...
by lisper on Monday May 27, 2024 @11:13PM
(#40496989)
The strategic purpose of this particular installment was to preemptively inoculate against ontological arguments for God, i.e. the argument that God is the source of logical and mathematical truth. But I didn't want to actually come out and say that explicitly at this early stage. I'm intentionally avoiding any overt mention of religion at this point. Does that answer your question?