Re:Instead of "auth", we should say "permissions" and "login"
by joemi on Monday May 27, 2024 @04:07PM
(#40494164)
offtopic, but: I think when your footnotes themselves need footnotes, there's probably a clearer way to write what you wanted to write. Jumping through multiple levels of nested footnotes is fairly hard to read, at least for me.
Re:Instead of "auth", we should say "permissions" and "login"
by inopinatus on Monday May 27, 2024 @04:12PM
(#40494208)
Indeed. They are log-structured.
Re:Instead of "auth", we should say "permissions" and "login"
by mrgoldenbrown on Monday May 27, 2024 @06:00PM
(#40495163)
It's most likely not that they needed footnoted footnotes, rather that they wanted them and structured their post on purpose to create them.
__________
[1] Derived from the signing of a ship's logbook³ when coming aboard.
[2] A few decades ago.
[3] The logbook originally⁴ recorded navigational data and is named for instruments measuring speed through water⁵, of which the simplest is literally throwing roped wooden logs off the stern and counting the knots on the line paying out per interval⁶.
[4] Doubtless some bright-eyed young hornblower with a glittering future career as an admiralty archivist realised that log-structured records could be generalised usefully to all timestamped event and measurement capture, which is why your syslog is full of crap.
[5] Consequently any vessel, maritime or otherwise, measures its speed through the medium in knots. The Enterprise NCC-1701-D, for example, tops out ca.146 megaknots under impulse engine.
[6] It follows by transitive etymology that you may use the term "knots" to edify and delight your colleagues when referring to the rate of creation of user sessions.