Tmux is worse-is-better

Re:Tmux is worse-is-better by lemonwaterlime on Sunday May 26, 2024 @08:15AM (#40481581)

The table you linked is chopped off on mobile. So you are looking at the last column and the person above is looking at the first column.

Also, why have you done an “alacritty” vs “alacritty+tmux” benchmark yet have not done a “kitty+tmux” benchmark on this same table? That’s a big omission. The entire conversation is about the effects of adding a multiplexer on top of a terminal.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Tmux is worse-is-better by aumerle on Monday May 27, 2024 @12:02PM (#40492012)

I didnt do the table go ask the kitty developer why he did that. Or just read the notes under the table where he tells you why he included alacritty+tmux.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Tmux is worse-is-better by jauntywundrkind on Monday May 27, 2024 @12:15PM (#40492150)

Yeah very weird article, having so many benchmarks but not testing the main thing they are griping against except in one case.

I chose the ASCII column because it's 99.999999% of what 99.9999% of developers see.

[ Parent | on HN ]