Their story is they didn't have a choice once others violated it and they had to defend themselves, and they make a very strong case.

Obviously you find Hamas, PA, and muslim countries in general (and in number, they are the largest faction in the UN general assembly) ... extremely opposed to any enforcement, because they blatantly violated international law again and again and again.

Again, the same argument can be made for the other side. Two things can be true at the same time; both Hamas and Israel do/did terrible things and its tiring that people defend one side no matter what.

Their [the Palestinans] story is they didn't have a choice once others violated it and they had to defend themselves, and they make a very strong case. Obviously you find Christian countries in general (and in number, they are the largest faction in the UN general assembly) ... extremely opposed to any enforcement, because they blatantly violated international law again and again and again.

*There are overwhelmingly more Christian-majority countries as compared to Muslim-majority countries. Also non of the Muslim counties have veto power. If you make an argument please base it on facts: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Coun...

I love how you make this argument. You only state correct facts, and yet you lie, by suddenly moving to the security council. Are you a politician?

I find it fascinating how lies can be so complicated, even if I suck at it. But yes, I've seen many times with dishonest politicians: you can purposefully lie by saying nothing but the truth, and just leave out a few facts.

https://www.un.org/en/model-united-nations/groups-member-sta...

See what it has to say about the OIC. I'll repeat it here: "The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), the 57-member-state that constitutes the largest voting block in the United Nations" ...

They mean the general assembly, of course. "Strange" how you totally leave out the general assembly (especially given how the ICJ is organised).

I mean, are you even going to pretend it's missing for any reason other than outright deception and lying? It's clear from your post, after all, that you know exactly what you're hiding. Which is what makes it a lie: it's a direct attempt to bring over a specific idea, which is not true, and you know exactly what you're doing.

And, once again, it's "not a good sign" that a pro-Palestinian is so deliberately hiding facts. It always seems to be the same side doing this.