Mp3tag – The Universal Tag Editor

Re:Mp3tag – The Universal Tag Editor by karmakaze on Friday May 24, 2024 @09:23PM (#40471949)

I would use 320kbps mp3s. At this point the space savings from 192kbps isn't worth anything and it's one of those things you wish you'd thought through so you won't have to do these steps again.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mp3tag – The Universal Tag Editor by russelg on Friday May 24, 2024 @10:25PM (#40472184)

Or V0 is acceptable as well. 192 is crazy...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mp3tag – The Universal Tag Editor by sandreas on Saturday May 25, 2024 @02:23AM (#40473013)

I'm not an audiophile. For me 192kbps is good enough at the time, but I get your Point. Space should not be a problem these days and why not go as good as possible. Maybe I'll change that in the future.

Like I described above I keep the FLAC Archive on a Harddisk, so if any day I decide to change my library format (e.g. to AAC to use FLAC), it is like one rsync, one import and one convert.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mp3tag – The Universal Tag Editor by globular-toast on Saturday May 25, 2024 @04:50AM (#40473668)

Always use V0. 192 is not good enough for many things, 320 is a waste of space.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mp3tag – The Universal Tag Editor by sandreas on Saturday May 25, 2024 @05:12AM (#40473750)

I'm gonna consider this for the future, thank you

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mp3tag – The Universal Tag Editor by Projectiboga on Saturday May 25, 2024 @11:35AM (#40475642)

I saw a study once, and it found 224kbps LAME mp3 worked for all types of music. So that is what I've always done.

[ Parent | on HN ]