Re:Show HN: We open sourced our entire text-to-SQL product
by akch on Friday May 24, 2024 @03:54PM
(#40469899)
Not finding the license anywhere. Which one have you chosen?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: We open sourced our entire text-to-SQL product
by aazo11 on Friday May 24, 2024 @04:04PM
(#40470013)
Hi -- the license is Apache 2.0
Re:Show HN: We open sourced our entire text-to-SQL product
by numlocked on Friday May 24, 2024 @05:07PM
(#40470482)
Is that documented somewhere? The "contributing" link in the readme also 404s. I would definitely need to understand the licensing and how contributing works before I could consider integrating this (and I would definitely consider it!). Cool stuff.
Re:Show HN: We open sourced our entire text-to-SQL product
by saigal on Friday May 24, 2024 @05:11PM
(#40470507)
We'll make the licensing more visible. Stay tuned in a few minutes.
Re:Show HN: We open sourced our entire text-to-SQL product
by numlocked on Friday May 24, 2024 @05:16PM
(#40470540)
thanks much!
Re:Show HN: We open sourced our entire text-to-SQL product
by aazo11 on Friday May 24, 2024 @08:02PM
(#40471559)
Added the License
Re:Show HN: We open sourced our entire text-to-SQL product
by threesevenths on Friday May 24, 2024 @04:06PM
(#40470023)
Guess it's public domain since there is no license
Re:Show HN: We open sourced our entire text-to-SQL product
by munk-a on Friday May 24, 2024 @05:14PM
(#40470528)
Just for future reference - if no license is given it's unlicensed. Licensing defaults closed for extremely good reasons - that's one of the reasons why github had a strong push for users to assign appropriate licensing documents to repositories a while back and declare those licenses in machine readable forms (if applicable).