Re:What should we do about Wikipedia's mature content problem?
by jpxxx on Thursday May 31, 2012 @01:22AM
(#4046542)
Truly, points to the author: he cloaked his loathing well. His concern lies somewhere between misguided and malicious.
So to the heart of this issue: What "extremely explicit" "disgusting" "pornographic" "adult content" is he referring to?
• close-up photographs of ordinary intercourse
Oh. Foundational information on a fundamental, universal behavior that propagates the human species. Yes, there's no reason "the children" should ever be allowed to define human intercourse or put it in a coherent context - best to just let them discover sex from a blinking pink banner ad.
So to the heart of this issue: What "extremely explicit" "disgusting" "pornographic" "adult content" is he referring to?
• close-up photographs of ordinary intercourse
Oh. Foundational information on a fundamental, universal behavior that propagates the human species. Yes, there's no reason "the children" should ever be allowed to define human intercourse or put it in a coherent context - best to just let them discover sex from a blinking pink banner ad.
What does this fool actually want?