News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How to Build 300k Airplanes in Five Years by yardstick on Friday May 24, 2024 @03:59AM (#40463989)
Probably a policy that directs funds, every year, to building ships and other critical things. Possibly to state owned construction conglomerates. Essentially what already happens with Boeing, Lockheed etc for military aircraft.
Re:How to Build 300k Airplanes in Five Years by pjc50 on Friday May 24, 2024 @06:07AM (#40464607)
> Essentially what already happens with Boeing

You want to subsidize a failing company?

The deeper problem is that, while the war isn't happening, the war products are not critical. It doesn't matter whether they work or are delivered. Even the medium scale wars the US did maintain over the past couple of decades to keep the machine going showed that various areas were just fleecing them for inadequate products or regular grift (like the vanishing Afghan government). Much of the Pacific fleet's maintenance budget was being stolen by one guy named "Fat Leonard". This sort of thing doesn't go away until the war is actually critical rather than something you can escape by turning off the news.

Re:How to Build 300k Airplanes in Five Years by salawat on Friday May 24, 2024 @08:41PM (#40471751)
You're doing that either way by not having competitors to Boeing.
Re:How to Build 300k Airplanes in Five Years by lupire on Sunday May 26, 2024 @06:14PM (#40485885)
Yes that's what "subsidize" means.

Fat Leaonard fleeced the Navy, but did provide services.

Re:How to Build 300k Airplanes in Five Years by bluGill on Friday May 24, 2024 @09:39AM (#40466160)
The US Navy builds a lot of ships and submarines in the US.