News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Fossil fuels could have been left in the dust 25 years ago. Parent comment

Re:Fossil fuels could have been left in the dust 25 years ago by ViewTrick1002 on Thursday May 23, 2024 @06:33PM (#40460682)
I don’t get the need to lie?

If you read the article you will clearly see that for all generations it got more expensive over time.

The first, the second, the third and fourth.

All of them. Standardization did not make it cheaper.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fossil fuels could have been left in the dust 25 years ago by mpweiher on Friday May 24, 2024 @03:03AM (#40463642)
That's a direct quote I copy-pasted from the article.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fossil fuels could have been left in the dust 25 years ago by ViewTrick1002 on Friday May 24, 2024 @06:07AM (#40464605)
I don’t see any standardization wins in this graph. It points up throughout the entire program.

Flamanville 3 and the EPR2s are incomprehensibly far above even the last one.

https://i.imgur.com/97E0zdn.jpeg

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fossil fuels could have been left in the dust 25 years ago by mpweiher on Saturday May 25, 2024 @04:02AM (#40473423)
The text I quoted is the last paragraph of section 3, page 5 of the article.
[ Parent | on HN ]