Glover v. Universal was settled out of court at the behest of Universal's insurer. We don't know who would have prevailed if it had continued.
And of course, some specific aspects of the case are unique. Universal used a face mold they had made of Glover's face, for instance.
The uncertainty is itself information. I would have assumed Universal would have been fine, but presumably expert legal advice thought the risk was fairly high.
I’ll give you the mold makes the intent more clear, but I doubt the jury is going to be debating intent. Pulling the voice suggests OpenAI thinks this is either a real risk or bad publicity.
I’m not saying Sky did anything wrong. But the final result is close enough many people assumed it was Scarlet without promoting, that’s problematic when they are making references to her role as an AI voice and obviously wanted to make a deal.