Re:S3 Is Showing Its Age
by beeeeerp on Wednesday May 22, 2024 @11:12PM
(#40450045)
I like Cloudflare, but this is also what makes me skeptical. There's no such thing as a free lunch, and I've had the rug pulled out from underneath me many times before. I wish they at least charged a sustainable amount for egress, because I feel like it's coming eventually.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Yeah you do have to wonder if this is destined for enshittification at some point. It does seem a bit to good to be true.
Supposedly it’s not applicable to R2, but their Enterprise egress pricing is around the $0.05/GB rate. They won’t contact you though until you start to get close to the $5,000/month usage level, which itself can be a problem as your fee goes from $0/month to $5,000/month.
R2 still has per-request fees which, given PUTs are still $4.50/million and GETs $0.36/million (only about 10% off S3’s), they still have significant margin there to cover egress for objects of reasonable size.
Yeah - I forgot about their opaque pricing tiers.
One other benefit of paying up front is that I think you are less restricted on S3/Cloudfront in what you can host. I think Cloudflare has some restrictions (video files?) to keep costs more sane. Otherwise, you could spin up a YouTube clone extremely cheap.
And just to reiterate, AWS pricing can be absurd.