Re:The Effects of Early Relational Trauma (2001) [pdf]
by throwaway2037 on Wednesday May 22, 2024 @11:40PM
(#40450224)
Social contagion affects girls and women much more than boys and men.
> It doesn't take therapy or a bunch of trauma ideology to know that hurting people is wrong.
If that simple explanation is true, why do the abused so frequently become the abusers? And why do they struggle to stop before therapy?
Re:The Effects of Early Relational Trauma (2001) [pdf]
by matrix87 on Wednesday May 22, 2024 @11:57PM
(#40450310)
> Social contagion affects girls and women much more than boys and men.
How is this related?
> And why do they struggle to stop before therapy?
Sounds like you're implying that they stop after therapy also
Do they, long term? Is it because of therapy or because courts/law enforcement are involved?
> why do the abused so frequently become the abusers?
I'm not saying that abuse does not make people more likely to abuse, I'm saying that therapy alone does not reliably make them better people
Social contagion is a thing. Just because more people are taking about something doesn't mean it's true
> Eventually, the damaged start damaging others, people put their hands over the ears pretending nothing's happening, and the cycle continues.
It doesn't take therapy or a bunch of trauma ideology to know that hurting people is wrong. Someone could have a perfect upbringing and still be a piece of shit. Alternatively someone could have a shitty upbringing and be a good person. The latter case doesn't require the person to "come to terms with their trauma" in the methodology that gets dictated to them by this decade's version of psychology
> The argument I was making had nothing to do with the pharmaceutical industry.
Maybe not directly, I was suggesting a more productive alternative than the one in the comment I was responding to