Re:Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylo...
by ToucanLoucan on Wednesday May 22, 2024 @03:17PM
(#40445019)
Nobody (apart from the dolt who wrote this anyway) is arguing he or Swift or anyone else doesn't have a reason to travel. You don't need a reason. That said, in times such as ours when we're all being told via our media and legislation passed that we need to be more eco-friendly, it's a slap in the face (and I'll say, it's 2 slaps from Musk who's fortune has been greatly bolstered by AMPLE Federal subsidies for green industry!) that they can't take a regular goddamn airplane like anyone else. Planes are ATROCIOUS for emissions simply by virtue of how a jet engine works and, at least right now, it's pretty clear that public opinion leans towards it's unethical to use such machines so frivolously.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylo...
by lolinder on Wednesday May 22, 2024 @03:20PM
(#40445075)
> Nobody's arguing he or Swift or anyone else doesn't have a reason to travel
The article literally says that Musk did not have a "pretty good reason to travel a lot last year":
> unlike someone like Musk, Swift actually had a pretty good reason to travel a lot last year
Re:Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylo...
by ToucanLoucan on Wednesday May 22, 2024 @03:25PM
(#40445157)
Fixed.
Re:Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylo...
by adgjlsfhk1 on Wednesday May 22, 2024 @03:32PM
(#40445271)
commercial planes are actually better per mile on emissions than most cars (around 100mpg per person). private jets of course are way worse though.