Which is also why it’s unethical to use a voice clearly designed to be mistaken for her.

I agree that it’s a bit of a sketchy thing to do, and potentially even illegal based on similar case law, but the commenter I responded to created an entire fake sequence of events that seems incredibly unlikely, when there’s a far simpler explanation.

I mean, I guess? I don't know how many people base their choice in AI model or application on the voice, but maybe I'm just not privy to that.