Re:Microsoft Says New Surface Pro Is Faster Than 15" M3 MacB...
by viraptor on Tuesday May 21, 2024 @12:53AM
(#40424290)
It works like that on most laptops. The GPU selection should be transparent on windows. (And can be done explicitly in Linux)
I know Linux has powertop which can measure energy usage per subsystem. Not sure if windows has something like that to answer your question?
Re:Microsoft Says New Surface Pro Is Faster Than 15" M3 MacB...
by asmor on Tuesday May 21, 2024 @01:01AM
(#40424328)
Been like that forever.
Usually gaming laptops prioritize their cooling systems over battery size. And don’t underestimate the high refresh rate panel likely optimized for at least 500 nits.
Re:Microsoft Says New Surface Pro Is Faster Than 15" M3 MacB...
by masklinn on Tuesday May 21, 2024 @01:23AM
(#40424474)
> And don’t underestimate the high refresh rate panel
Literally one of the reasons Apple added variable refresh rates on their pro phones: if you can vrr down, you save a ton of battery when you run the panel at 1Hz.
Re:Microsoft Says New Surface Pro Is Faster Than 15" M3 MacB...
by achneerov on Tuesday May 21, 2024 @12:17PM
(#40430440)
I’m pretty sure any MacBook Pro with ProMotion can only drop to 24hz
“the MacBook Pro’s ProMotion display can range from 24Hz to 120Hz.”
https://9to5mac.com/2021/10/19/macbook-pro-promotion-tidbits....
I don't expect the battery life to be as good as non-gaming laptops, of course, but I feel like it should probably last longer than like an hour and a half.