Re:Statement from Scarlett Johansson on the OpenAI "Sky" voice
by spuz on Monday May 20, 2024 @08:21PM
(#40422428)
The damning part is that they tried to contact her and get her to reconsider their offer only 2 days before the model was demoed. That tells you that at the very least they either felt a moral or legal obligation to get her to agree with their release of the model.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Statement from Scarlett Johansson on the OpenAI "Sky" voice
by IncreasePosts on Monday May 20, 2024 @08:25PM
(#40422465)
Or, they wanted to be able to say, yes, that is "her" talking to you.
I have no idea if they really used her voice, or it is a voice that just sounds like her to some. I'm just saying openai's behavior isn't a smoking gun.
Re:Statement from Scarlett Johansson on the OpenAI "Sky" voice
by johnnyanmac on Tuesday May 21, 2024 @02:45AM
(#40424933)
> a reference to an object or fact that serves as conclusive evidence of a crime or similar act, just short of being caught in flagrante delicto.
If this isn't a smoking gun, I don't know what it.
I think people forget the last part of the definition, though. A Smoking gun is about as close as you get without having objective, non-doctored footage of the act. There's a small chance the gun is a red herring, but it's still suspicious.