Re:Uber Migrates 1T Records from DynamoDB to LedgerStore to ...
by shrubble on Monday May 20, 2024 @09:43AM
(#40415389)
If the savings are 6 million per year, then in later years it should pay off since the development is a one time cost.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Uber Migrates 1T Records from DynamoDB to LedgerStore to ...
by inoop on Monday May 20, 2024 @09:59AM
(#40415537)
The cost doesn't suddenly drop to zero once development is done. Typically a system of this complexity and scale requires constant maintenance. You'll need someone to be on-call (pager duty) to respond to alarms, you'll need to fix bugs, improve efficiency, apply security patches, tune alarms and metrics, etc.
In my experience you probably need a small team (6-8 people) to maintain something like this. Maybe you can consolidate some things (e.g. if your system has low on-call pressure, you may be able to merge rotations with other teams, etc.) but it doesn't go down to zero.
Re:Uber Migrates 1T Records from DynamoDB to LedgerStore to ...
by shrubble on Monday May 20, 2024 @04:03PM
(#40419637)
If you follow the various links on the Uber site, you see that they have multiple applications sitting on the same database. see https://www.uber.com/blog/schemaless-sql-database/ . It's not just 1 design of a database, with 1 application on top...