Re:Sam and Greg's response to OpenAI Safety researcher claims
by naijaboiler on Sunday May 19, 2024 @08:25AM
(#40406475)
Humans can never run out of economic activities we call for each other. Period!
Re:Sam and Greg's response to OpenAI Safety researcher claims
by hnlmorg on Sunday May 19, 2024 @02:30PM
(#40408815)
I don’t understand what you’re trying to say there.
Re:Sam and Greg's response to OpenAI Safety researcher claims
by shinycode on Sunday May 19, 2024 @07:09AM
(#40406050)
I completely agree with your conclusion and that is ideal. Will there be companies that make the choice to invest money into retraining a major part of their workforce ? I really hope so because it’s an elegant solution.
Yes some jobs are menial but they are still some people’s literal livelihoods. And yes, industries need to evolve and job preservation shouldn’t be the #1 criteria for holding back change.
The real question we should be asking ourselves isn’t either of those two former points but actually this:
Is the pace of change too quick, or is there any support to allow those economically affected by change to be able to retrain?
Removing jobs doesn’t help society because it just leads to unemployment and thus more people dependent on the state. But retraining people is absolutely a benefit. For example, if call centres replaced the first line support with AI, that could lead to shorter call waiting times. But the existing call centre staff could become 2nd line support, account managers for business accounts, install engineers, or even AI supervisors that review a subset of AI interactions to ensure customer satisfaction is maintained.