Every story and comment from the Hacker News API, in a layout borrowed from 2001.
A comment on Sam and Greg's response to OpenAI Safety researcher claims. Parent comment
> There are very real disagreements between very real experts on just how dangerous these new technologies are
…but they do not dispute that the technology is impactful.
In fact, anyone who claims it is just “Text continuation”(quote) is being deliberately disingenuous and deliberately downplaying it.
> Comparing skepticism about AI alarmism to climate change denial is just lazy internet rhetoric
Unlike calling AI “Text continuation”?
It’s awfully convenient it’s only lazy internet rhetoric when it’s coming from the other side.
Hm?
Why is only one side allowed to do that?
Would you care to call out the other side for being reductionist?
That’s a very high horse you’re sitting on.
There are no comments on this comment yet.
> There are very real disagreements between very real experts on just how dangerous these new technologies are
…but they do not dispute that the technology is impactful.
In fact, anyone who claims it is just “Text continuation”(quote) is being deliberately disingenuous and deliberately downplaying it.
> Comparing skepticism about AI alarmism to climate change denial is just lazy internet rhetoric
Unlike calling AI “Text continuation”?
It’s awfully convenient it’s only lazy internet rhetoric when it’s coming from the other side.
Hm?
Why is only one side allowed to do that?
Would you care to call out the other side for being reductionist?
That’s a very high horse you’re sitting on.