Re:Seven Dyson Sphere Candidates
by bitmasher9 on Sunday May 19, 2024 @12:15AM
(#40404232)
Send an agent to an uninhabited star system and launch the rocks from there. Everyone that can see would see the energy expenditures, but they would get very little information other than the knowledge that a stealth based hostile civilization exists. This information would encourage everyone else to be less noisy.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Seven Dyson Sphere Candidates
by underlipton on Sunday May 19, 2024 @12:10PM
(#40407853)
The "stealthy" civilization has ceased to be stealthy, in this case. Launching an attack of any kind defeats the purpose, if anyone but the fully-wiped-out target can see. Your example suggests that a stealthy, hostile civilization isn't possible.
Re:Seven Dyson Sphere Candidates
by bitmasher9 on Sunday May 19, 2024 @04:32PM
(#40409546)
What would an observer see? It’s plausible that they would see an attack from an uninhabited solar system but not be able to find the home location of the attacker.
Re:Seven Dyson Sphere Candidates
by underlipton on Tuesday May 21, 2024 @04:59PM
(#40433844)
Ooh, that's the fun part. What (augmented) sense does the observer rely on? On what timescale? How was the attack coordinated? The attack surface of the operation - and the ability to trace it back to its origin - might be wider than you can plan for. "Plausible" is a shaky ground to be on with your civilization in the balance, if you suspect there's even a chance you can be discovered and have chosen to remain as hidden as possible heretofore. Dark Forest doctrine and hostility are incompatible, I think.