Re:Sam and Greg's response to OpenAI Safety researcher claims
by kevindamm on Saturday May 18, 2024 @11:40PM
(#40404090)
Not parent, but perhaps it was an analogous interpretation: believe in AGI and AGI is possible vs believing in AGI and AGI is not possible, likewise for not believing.
Perhaps some people think believing in the possibility of AGI is justified because they are positioning themselves to benefit from it (with no real loss if it doesn't pan out) vs acting like it's not possible then missing out if it is.
Meanwhile, others of us that recognize its limitations see their enthusiasm as just wanting to believe so badly.
Perhaps some people think believing in the possibility of AGI is justified because they are positioning themselves to benefit from it (with no real loss if it doesn't pan out) vs acting like it's not possible then missing out if it is.
Meanwhile, others of us that recognize its limitations see their enthusiasm as just wanting to believe so badly.