Re:Egypt's Pyramids May Have Been Built on a Long-Lost Branc...
by AlotOfReading on Thursday May 16, 2024 @01:17PM
(#40380803)
That's simultaneously true, and misleading to the point of being wrong. The earliest parts of the layers date that far back, yes. The features of Gobekli Tepe that people who aren't archaeologists actually care about like the obelisks date much later around the second phase of the neolithic (PPNB).
Also note that Gobekli Tepe is neither the oldest site we know of nor unique in having monumental architecture. Even within the Tepler culture, Karahan Tepe dates earlier and I'm sure you heard of the older site of Jericho.
Re:Egypt's Pyramids May Have Been Built on a Long-Lost Branc...
by danparsonson on Thursday May 16, 2024 @05:17PM
(#40383307)
From your link: "Radiocarbon dating shows that the earliest exposed structures at Göbekli Tepe were built between 9500 and 9000 BCE"
Re:Egypt's Pyramids May Have Been Built on a Long-Lost Branc...
by Retric on Thursday May 16, 2024 @05:40PM
(#40383582)
~9500 BCE + 2024 - 1 = ~11,523 years ago.
So yea not quite 12,000 years ago.
Re:Egypt's Pyramids May Have Been Built on a Long-Lost Branc...
by danparsonson on Friday May 17, 2024 @12:26AM
(#40386379)
Oops, thank you - I can't read apparently!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Göbekli_Tepe#:~:text=Radiocarb....