Re:Gunshot detection system transforms and raises issues
by larrys on Monday May 28, 2012 @06:01PM
(#4035100)
"I don't see why shooting a UAV would be any more fun "
Doesn't have to be the thug shooting it down. Can be a pain in the ass bystander in the hood or someone with a baseball or rock. Have you ever seen kids who throw sneakers up over electrical pole wires in the inner city?
"they'd be less likely to shoot at something that shoots back."
Absolutely positively not going to happen.
Re:Gunshot detection system transforms and raises issues
by JabavuAdams on Monday May 28, 2012 @07:54PM
(#4035409)
Huh. I'm pretty sure that shooting down a UAV would be fun, and I'm not even a criminal.
I know of army units that have a machine-gun-the-RC-planes day for fun.
Re:Gunshot detection system transforms and raises issues
by politician on Monday May 28, 2012 @07:10PM
(#4035303)
> If you know what the UAVs are for, you know that your shooting will be heard..
If only there was a device which could be affixed to the barrel of a pistol which could reduce the decibel level associated with the firing process... ;)
Another form of protection: they'd be less likely to shoot at something that shoots back. (Good luck making that legal for a private company though, even if the UAV managed 99% non-lethal accuracy!)
I think UAVs are impractical for other reasons (why not just put cameras everywhere instead of a fewer number of mobile cameras?), but I still don't think they'd be that much more a target for destruction than the electrical grid.