Re:She was accused of faking incriminating video of cheerlea...
by r8533292 on Saturday May 11, 2024 @07:44PM
(#40331333)
that's what her lawyer says, the appeals court disagrees with what her lawyer says, they upheld the original decision and explain in detail why in the opinion https://casetext.com/case/commonwealth-v-spone. "The above cited evidence directly contradicts Spone's suggestion that she was a concerned parent who had a legitimate purpose in sending the series of anonymous text messages."
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:She was accused of faking incriminating video of cheerlea...
by CRConrad on Tuesday May 14, 2024 @04:32AM
(#40352875)
> "The above cited evidence directly contradicts Spone's suggestion that she was a concerned parent who had a legitimate purpose in sending the series of anonymous text messages."
OK, I read it, and I can't see that it does. Explain how. (And no, her doing it anonymously doesn't contradict her being genuinely concerned. Why would it?)