News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GhostStripe attack haunts self-driving cars by making the... by edge17 on Friday May 10, 2024 @02:28PM (#40322271)
Six boffins mostly hailing from Singapore-based universities have proven it's possible to interfere with autonomous vehicles by exploiting their reliance on camera-based computer vision and cause them to not recognize road signs.

How do non-camera based systems (lidar etc) get road sign information? I would expect with cameras...?

Re:GhostStripe attack haunts self-driving cars by making the... by bennyhill on Friday May 10, 2024 @02:50PM (#40322521)
With cameras alone it seems pretty easy to trick them into dismissing road signs as nonexistent.. I think Lidar alone should be telling you there is a sign, so your camera is faulty or someone is putting up blank signs.

Lidar as I was told to use it would be in conjunction with a database of way points like signs, so the trouble would be knowing if the sign was updated.

Re:GhostStripe attack haunts self-driving cars by making the... by recursive on Friday May 10, 2024 @03:11PM (#40322784)
My car doesn't seem to have any trouble reading temporary construction speed limit signs and the like. And it has lidar. This seems to be a solved problem.
Re:GhostStripe attack haunts self-driving cars by making the... by bennyhill on Friday May 10, 2024 @03:22PM (#40322880)
Are you saying it exclusively has lidar? If not then I don't understand your comment.
Re:GhostStripe attack haunts self-driving cars by making the... by recursive on Friday May 10, 2024 @04:41PM (#40323579)
It also has cameras. I might have assumed too much.

I don't know how it determines the existence of a sign. It might be visual, lidar, or a combination.

I think I drew a faulty and unstated inference. Feel free to disregard.