News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IPhone Dev Spends $500k on Development, Still Not Approve... by iigs on Thursday December 18, 2008 @11:32PM (#403022)
You are absolutely correct. I would say that I'd rather have the RAM ICs socketed, though, especially considering that the first Mac had a meager 128k of it. :(
Re:IPhone Dev Spends $500k on Development, Still Not Approve... by kragen on Friday December 19, 2008 @12:27AM (#403062)
Could you piggyback RAM by soldering it on top of the existing chips, bending out a single chip-enable pin so it alone wasn't in parallel with the existing chips, and soldering it to a wire? I had an H89 with 64K of RAM; the last 16K was hacked in that way.
Re:IPhone Dev Spends $500k on Development, Still Not Approve... by ComputerGuru on Friday December 19, 2008 @02:40AM (#403131)
Not without switching around the address lines, at the very least.