Re:Coding interviews are stupid (ish)
by pseudalopex on Wednesday May 08, 2024 @01:33PM
(#40300799)
The Wikipedia article did not define affirmative action as positive discrimination.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Coding interviews are stupid (ish)
by spacebanana7 on Wednesday May 08, 2024 @01:42PM
(#40300913)
“Affirmative action (also sometimes called reservations, alternative access, positive discrimination or positive action in various countries' laws and policies)…”
It calls them the same thing
Re:Coding interviews are stupid (ish)
by pseudalopex on Wednesday May 08, 2024 @01:48PM
(#40300978)
No. Positive discrimination is a form of affirmative action in various countries' laws and policies. Positive action is another. Positive action is not positive discrimination. Paragraph 2 mentioned merely targeting encouragement for increased participation even if you did not know what positive action meant.
Re:Coding interviews are stupid (ish)
by spacebanana7 on Wednesday May 08, 2024 @02:16PM
(#40301301)
The text attests to both our interpretations.
1) By saying x is sometimes called y under some circumstances, the text implies x (Affirmative action) is equal to or a subset of y (Positive discrimination)
2) The second paragraph also suggests examples of affirmative action that wouldn’t constitute positive discrimination
Re:Coding interviews are stupid (ish)
by pseudalopex on Wednesday May 08, 2024 @02:24PM
(#40301374)
The text would support your interpretation if the article ended after the 1st sentence. And the 1st sentence did not mention positive action.