News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The search for easier safe systems programming by bluGill on Wednesday May 08, 2024 @10:49AM (#40298713)
The reality is people have 30 year old code bases, and so a messy evolution without breaking backward compatibility is and important part of reality. C++ could have been a much better language without backwards compatibility - but nobody would used it and so what is the point.
Re:The search for easier safe systems programming by UncleMeat on Wednesday May 08, 2024 @10:59AM (#40298830)
I don't think that C++'s rigorous adherence to backwards compatibility (include binary compatibility) is a bad choice. It has served the language well. It just has consequences.