News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Caniemail.com (like caniuse but for email content) by CRConrad on Wednesday May 08, 2024 @08:25AM (#40297229)
> More to the point, it's not plain text anymore if the user gets something that has been interpreted and then rendered by the software.

Arguably it is. It was sent as plain text and received as plain text. The fact that the recipient's software goes through and interprets that plain text and does something when it detects an URL in it doesn't change that. If the recipient were to use some other software that doesn't do that, they'd see... Plain text. Because that's what it is.

Re:Caniemail.com (like caniuse but for email content) by lelanthran on Thursday May 09, 2024 @03:17AM (#40306020)
> Arguably it is. It was sent as plain text and received as plain text. The fact that the recipient's software goes through and interprets that plain text and does something when it detects an URL in it doesn't change that. If the recipient were to use some other software that doesn't do that, they'd see... Plain text. Because that's what it is.

Exactly like .... the subset of HTML we see in emails?

I have not yet gotten an HTML email that, when displayed in plain-text, was unreadable. Neither, I suspect, have you.

Re:Caniemail.com (like caniuse but for email content) by CRConrad on Sunday May 12, 2024 @05:50AM (#40333259)
You suspect wrong, and I suspect you know it. I also suspect you're just plain lying. Just display any HTML spam you get as plain text.