To which I pointed out that unlimited rights to self-determination include justifying genocide.
To which you rebutted that other countries have self-determination and avoid genocide.
To which I rebutted that those other states aren't founded on ethno-religious identities.
You are saying that denying the rights of Jews to self determination in their native land is not antisemitic, because Jewish identity is tied into both an ethnicity and a religion, making Jews inherent murderers and thus undeserving of a state. This is as opposed to say the French or German people, whose identity is mostly ethnic, who have a long history of peace, devoid of genocide, murder and disenfranchisement.
What limits do you place on "self determination", as you define it?
And I'd point out that modern France and Germany are much less religious and more religiously diverse than Israel. (Even including Israeli Muslims)
But yes, historically states with high religiosity and state-entwined religions tend to be murderous: it's always a good reason for a just war.
Somewhat ironic as currently the average French person is probably safer in Tel Aviv than the average Jew is in Paris.